Chad vs Namibia: Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant)

Chad
0.1395 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia
0.0729 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Chad rank
135th
Namibia rank
138th

Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant) over time

  • Chad
  • Namibia
00.050.10.15196119922023

How they compare

Chad currently reports 0.1395 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.0729 1000 USD per square kilometre in Namibia, a difference of 0.0666 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Chad's figure about 1.9 times Namibia's.

Across all 55 years both countries report, Chad has been ahead every year.

Chad ranks 135th and Namibia ranks 138th of 140 countries.

Chad has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chad Namibia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0712 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0058 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0654 1000 USD per square kilometre Chad
1970s 0.0845 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0072 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0773 1000 USD per square kilometre Chad
1980s 0.1088 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0092 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0997 1000 USD per square kilometre Chad
1990s 0.1188 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0161 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1027 1000 USD per square kilometre Chad
2000s 0.127 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0355 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0915 1000 USD per square kilometre Chad
2010s 0.1375 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0573 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0802 1000 USD per square kilometre Chad
2020s 0.1393 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0717 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0676 1000 USD per square kilometre Chad

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher vegetables and fruit primary — gross production value (constant), Chad or Namibia?
Chad, at 0.1395 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.0729 1000 USD per square kilometre in Namibia as of 2023.
What is the difference in vegetables and fruit primary — gross production value (constant) between Chad and Namibia?
0.0666 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Chad ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Namibia?
55 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chad and Namibia rank globally for vegetables and fruit primary — gross production value (constant)?
Chad ranks 135th and Namibia ranks 138th of 140 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chad vs Namibia: Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-and-fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-3/chad/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-and-fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-3/chad/namibia/">Chad vs Namibia: Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
141 places, 7,828 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.