Chad vs Iceland: Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant)

Chad
0.1395 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Iceland
0.1816 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Chad rank
135th
Iceland rank
134th

Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant) over time

  • Chad
  • Iceland
00.050.10.150.2196119922023

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 0.1816 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.1395 1000 USD per square kilometre in Chad, a difference of 0.0421 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Iceland's figure about 1.3 times Chad's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Chad ahead.

Chad ranks 135th and Iceland ranks 134th of 140 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Chad averaged higher in 4 and Iceland in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chad Iceland Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0712 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0223 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0489 1000 USD per square kilometre Chad
1970s 0.0845 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0286 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0559 1000 USD per square kilometre Chad
1980s 0.1088 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0452 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0636 1000 USD per square kilometre Chad
1990s 0.1188 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0756 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0432 1000 USD per square kilometre Chad
2000s 0.127 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1474 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0203 1000 USD per square kilometre Iceland
2010s 0.1375 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1816 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0441 1000 USD per square kilometre Iceland
2020s 0.1393 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1805 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0412 1000 USD per square kilometre Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher vegetables and fruit primary — gross production value (constant), Chad or Iceland?
Iceland, at 0.1816 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.1395 1000 USD per square kilometre in Chad as of 2023.
What is the difference in vegetables and fruit primary — gross production value (constant) between Chad and Iceland?
0.0421 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Iceland?
55 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chad and Iceland rank globally for vegetables and fruit primary — gross production value (constant)?
Chad ranks 135th and Iceland ranks 134th of 140 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chad vs Iceland: Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-and-fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-3/chad/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-and-fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-3/chad/iceland/">Chad vs Iceland: Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
141 places, 7,828 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.