How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Zambia?

50 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Malta vs Zambia: Vegetables and Fruit: Gross Production Value (constant) … capita SLC

Malta

0.0369 1000 SLC per person

in 2024

Zambia

0.0269 1000 SLC per person

in 2024

Malta rank

132nd

Zambia rank

135th

Vegetables and Fruit: Gross Production Value (constant) … capita SLC over time

Malta
Zambia

How they compare

Malta currently reports 0.0369 1000 SLC per person against 0.0269 1000 SLC per person in Zambia, a difference of 0.01 1000 SLC per person.

That makes Malta's figure about 1.4 times Zambia's.

Across all 50 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.

Malta ranks 132nd and Zambia ranks 135th of 142 countries.

Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Malta	Zambia	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.0957 1000 SLC per person	0.0613 1000 SLC per person	0.0344 1000 SLC per person	Malta
1970s	0.1206 1000 SLC per person	0.0645 1000 SLC per person	0.0561 1000 SLC per person	Malta
1980s	0.1311 1000 SLC per person	0.061 1000 SLC per person	0.0701 1000 SLC per person	Malta
1990s	0.1311 1000 SLC per person	0.0613 1000 SLC per person	0.0698 1000 SLC per person	Malta
2000s	0.1188 1000 SLC per person	0.035 1000 SLC per person	0.0838 1000 SLC per person	Malta
2010s	0.0971 1000 SLC per person	0.0338 1000 SLC per person	0.0633 1000 SLC per person	Malta
2020s	0.0423 1000 SLC per person	0.0283 1000 SLC per person	0.0141 1000 SLC per person	Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher vegetables and fruit primary — gross production value (constant), Malta or Zambia?: Malta, at 0.0369 1000 SLC per person against 0.0269 1000 SLC per person in Zambia as of 2024.
What is the difference in vegetables and fruit primary — gross production value (constant) between Malta and Zambia?: 0.01 1000 SLC per person, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Zambia?: 50 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Malta and Zambia rank globally for vegetables and fruit primary — gross production value (constant)?: Malta ranks 132nd and Zambia ranks 135th of 142 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malta vs Zambia: Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-and-fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per/malta/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-and-fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per/malta/zambia/">Malta vs Zambia: Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per capita
Unit: 1000 SLC per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 142 places, 8,057 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 07 October 2026

Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.