How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and Serbia?

18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Pakistan vs Serbia: Vegetables and Fruit: Gross Production Value … square kilometre SLC

Pakistan

964.88 1000 SLC per square kilometre

in 2023

Serbia

1,190 1000 SLC per square kilometre

in 2023

Pakistan rank

36th

Serbia rank

33rd

Vegetables and Fruit: Gross Production Value … square kilometre SLC over time

Pakistan
Serbia

How they compare

Serbia currently reports 1,190 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 964.88 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Pakistan, a difference of 225.12 1000 SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Serbia's figure about 1.2 times Pakistan's.

Across all 18 years both countries report, Serbia has been ahead every year.

Pakistan ranks 36th and Serbia ranks 33rd of 142 countries.

Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Pakistan	Serbia	Difference	Ahead
2000s	662.68 1000 SLC per square kilometre	1,672 1000 SLC per square kilometre	1,009 1000 SLC per square kilometre	Serbia
2010s	709.78 1000 SLC per square kilometre	1,362 1000 SLC per square kilometre	652.51 1000 SLC per square kilometre	Serbia
2020s	900.14 1000 SLC per square kilometre	1,369 1000 SLC per square kilometre	468.89 1000 SLC per square kilometre	Serbia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher vegetables and fruit primary — gross production value (constant), Pakistan or Serbia?: Serbia, at 1,190 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 964.88 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Pakistan as of 2023.
What is the difference in vegetables and fruit primary — gross production value (constant) between Pakistan and Serbia?: 225.12 1000 SLC per square kilometre, with Serbia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and Serbia?: 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Pakistan and Serbia rank globally for vegetables and fruit primary — gross production value (constant)?: Pakistan ranks 36th and Serbia ranks 33rd of 142 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Pakistan vs Serbia: Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-and-fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-2/pakistan/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-and-fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-2/pakistan/serbia/">Pakistan vs Serbia: Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre
Unit: 1000 SLC per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 142 places, 7,917 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 07 October 2026

Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.