Chad vs Mozambique: Vegetables and Fruit: Gross Production Value … square kilometre SLC

Chad
76.19 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Mozambique
85.55 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Chad rank
69th
Mozambique rank
66th

Vegetables and Fruit: Gross Production Value … square kilometre SLC over time

  • Chad
  • Mozambique
050100150196119922023

How they compare

Mozambique currently reports 85.55 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 76.19 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Chad, a difference of 9.36 1000 SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Mozambique's figure about 1.1 times Chad's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 55 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Chad ahead.

Chad ranks 69th and Mozambique ranks 66th of 142 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Chad averaged higher in 6 and Mozambique in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chad Mozambique Difference Ahead
1960s 38.87 1000 SLC per square kilometre 6.15 1000 SLC per square kilometre 32.73 1000 SLC per square kilometre Chad
1970s 46.17 1000 SLC per square kilometre 7.74 1000 SLC per square kilometre 38.43 1000 SLC per square kilometre Chad
1980s 59.44 1000 SLC per square kilometre 7.87 1000 SLC per square kilometre 51.57 1000 SLC per square kilometre Chad
1990s 64.87 1000 SLC per square kilometre 8.99 1000 SLC per square kilometre 55.87 1000 SLC per square kilometre Chad
2000s 69.38 1000 SLC per square kilometre 15.63 1000 SLC per square kilometre 53.75 1000 SLC per square kilometre Chad
2010s 75.09 1000 SLC per square kilometre 52.55 1000 SLC per square kilometre 22.55 1000 SLC per square kilometre Chad
2020s 76.07 1000 SLC per square kilometre 110.55 1000 SLC per square kilometre 34.48 1000 SLC per square kilometre Mozambique

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher vegetables and fruit primary — gross production value (constant), Chad or Mozambique?
Mozambique, at 85.55 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 76.19 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Chad as of 2023.
What is the difference in vegetables and fruit primary — gross production value (constant) between Chad and Mozambique?
9.36 1000 SLC per square kilometre, with Mozambique ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Mozambique?
55 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chad and Mozambique rank globally for vegetables and fruit primary — gross production value (constant)?
Chad ranks 69th and Mozambique ranks 66th of 142 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chad vs Mozambique: Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-and-fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-2/chad/mozambique/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-and-fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-2/chad/mozambique/">Chad vs Mozambique: Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
142 places, 7,917 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.