Pakistan vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant)

Pakistan
0.0282 1000 Int$ per person
in 2024
Saint Kitts and Nevis
0.0296 1000 Int$ per person
in 2024
Pakistan rank
125th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
124th

Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant) over time

  • Pakistan
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
00.010.020.03196119922024

How they compare

Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 0.0296 1000 Int$ per person against 0.0282 1000 Int$ per person in Pakistan, a difference of 0.0014 1000 Int$ per person.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Pakistan ahead.

Pakistan ranks 125th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 124th of 170 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Pakistan averaged higher in 6 and Saint Kitts and Nevis in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Pakistan Saint Kitts and Nevis Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0207 1000 Int$ per person 0.0152 1000 Int$ per person 0.0055 1000 Int$ per person Pakistan
1970s 0.0238 1000 Int$ per person 0.018 1000 Int$ per person 0.0058 1000 Int$ per person Pakistan
1980s 0.0262 1000 Int$ per person 0.0211 1000 Int$ per person 0.0051 1000 Int$ per person Pakistan
1990s 0.03 1000 Int$ per person 0.024 1000 Int$ per person 0.006 1000 Int$ per person Pakistan
2000s 0.0286 1000 Int$ per person 0.0267 1000 Int$ per person 0.002 1000 Int$ per person Pakistan
2010s 0.0268 1000 Int$ per person 0.0294 1000 Int$ per person 0.0026 1000 Int$ per person Saint Kitts and Nevis
2020s 0.0297 1000 Int$ per person 0.0295 1000 Int$ per person 0.0002 1000 Int$ per person Pakistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher vegetables and fruit primary — gross production value (constant), Pakistan or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 0.0296 1000 Int$ per person against 0.0282 1000 Int$ per person in Pakistan as of 2024.
What is the difference in vegetables and fruit primary — gross production value (constant) between Pakistan and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
0.0014 1000 Int$ per person, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Pakistan and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for vegetables and fruit primary — gross production value (constant)?
Pakistan ranks 125th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 124th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Pakistan vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-and-fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per/pakistan/st-kitts-and-nevis/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-and-fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per/pakistan/st-kitts-and-nevis/">Pakistan vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per capita
Unit
1000 Int$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
171 places, 9,898 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.