Oman vs Zimbabwe: Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant)

Oman
2.93 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
3.03 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Oman rank
113th
Zimbabwe rank
110th

Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant) over time

  • Oman
  • Zimbabwe
0123196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 3.03 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 2.93 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Oman, a difference of 0.1 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 61 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Oman ahead.

Oman ranks 113th and Zimbabwe ranks 110th of 170 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Oman averaged higher in 6 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Oman Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1848 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1328 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.052 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Oman
1970s 0.2525 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.187 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0655 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Oman
1980s 0.5479 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2431 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3049 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Oman
1990s 0.8647 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3175 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5472 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Oman
2000s 1.11 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5825 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5314 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Oman
2010s 1.72 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.54 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1801 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Oman
2020s 2.78 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.91 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1315 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher vegetables and fruit primary — gross production value (constant), Oman or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 3.03 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 2.93 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Oman as of 2023.
What is the difference in vegetables and fruit primary — gross production value (constant) between Oman and Zimbabwe?
0.1 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Oman and Zimbabwe?
61 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Oman and Zimbabwe rank globally for vegetables and fruit primary — gross production value (constant)?
Oman ranks 113th and Zimbabwe ranks 110th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Oman vs Zimbabwe: Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-and-fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-3/oman/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-and-fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-3/oman/zimbabwe/">Oman vs Zimbabwe: Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
171 places, 9,729 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.