Norway vs Zambia: Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant)

Norway
0.2687 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
0.2746 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Norway rank
158th
Zambia rank
157th

Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant) over time

  • Norway
  • Zambia
0.10.20.30.40.50.6196119922023

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 0.2746 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.2687 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Norway, a difference of 0.0059 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 49 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Norway ahead.

Norway ranks 158th and Zambia ranks 157th of 170 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Norway averaged higher in 6 and Zambia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Norway Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.4193 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0884 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3309 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Norway
1970s 0.4561 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1199 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3362 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Norway
1980s 0.524 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1695 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3545 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Norway
1990s 0.3849 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1952 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1897 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Norway
2000s 0.2659 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2289 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0371 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Norway
2010s 0.265 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2652 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0002 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zambia
2020s 0.2742 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2735 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0007 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Norway

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher vegetables and fruit primary — gross production value (constant), Norway or Zambia?
Zambia, at 0.2746 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.2687 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Norway as of 2023.
What is the difference in vegetables and fruit primary — gross production value (constant) between Norway and Zambia?
0.0059 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Norway and Zambia?
49 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Norway and Zambia rank globally for vegetables and fruit primary — gross production value (constant)?
Norway ranks 158th and Zambia ranks 157th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Norway vs Zambia: Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-and-fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-3/norway/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-and-fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-3/norway/zambia/">Norway vs Zambia: Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
171 places, 9,729 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.