New Zealand vs Samoa: Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant)

New Zealand
6.69 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Samoa
7.41 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
New Zealand rank
80th
Samoa rank
77th

Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant) over time

  • New Zealand
  • Samoa
02468196119922023

How they compare

Samoa currently reports 7.41 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 6.69 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in New Zealand, a difference of 0.72 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Samoa's figure about 1.1 times New Zealand's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Samoa has been ahead every year.

New Zealand ranks 80th and Samoa ranks 77th of 170 countries.

Samoa has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Zealand Samoa Difference Ahead
1960s 0.7507 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 7.77 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 7.02 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Samoa
1970s 1.1 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 8.07 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 6.97 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Samoa
1980s 2.08 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 7.48 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 5.39 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Samoa
1990s 3.6 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 5.31 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.71 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Samoa
2000s 4.35 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 7.3 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.95 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Samoa
2010s 5.5 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 7.44 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.93 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Samoa
2020s 6.55 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 7.45 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.8968 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Samoa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher vegetables and fruit primary — gross production value (constant), New Zealand or Samoa?
Samoa, at 7.41 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 6.69 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in New Zealand as of 2023.
What is the difference in vegetables and fruit primary — gross production value (constant) between New Zealand and Samoa?
0.72 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Samoa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Samoa?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do New Zealand and Samoa rank globally for vegetables and fruit primary — gross production value (constant)?
New Zealand ranks 80th and Samoa ranks 77th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Zealand vs Samoa: Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-and-fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-3/new-zealand/samoa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-and-fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-3/new-zealand/samoa/">New Zealand vs Samoa: Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
171 places, 9,729 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.