Libya vs Zambia: Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant)

Libya
0.3901 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
0.2746 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Libya rank
155th
Zambia rank
157th

Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant) over time

  • Libya
  • Zambia
00.10.20.30.4196119922023

How they compare

Libya currently reports 0.3901 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.2746 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Zambia, a difference of 0.1155 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Libya's figure about 1.4 times Zambia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 49 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Zambia ahead.

Libya ranks 155th and Zambia ranks 157th of 170 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Libya averaged higher in 6 and Zambia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Libya Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0625 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0884 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0259 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zambia
1970s 0.1481 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1199 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0282 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Libya
1980s 0.2259 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1695 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0564 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Libya
1990s 0.2631 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1952 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0679 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Libya
2000s 0.3362 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2289 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1073 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Libya
2010s 0.3743 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2652 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1091 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Libya
2020s 0.3863 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2735 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1128 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Libya

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher vegetables and fruit primary — gross production value (constant), Libya or Zambia?
Libya, at 0.3901 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.2746 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Zambia as of 2023.
What is the difference in vegetables and fruit primary — gross production value (constant) between Libya and Zambia?
0.1155 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Libya ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Zambia?
49 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Libya and Zambia rank globally for vegetables and fruit primary — gross production value (constant)?
Libya ranks 155th and Zambia ranks 157th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Libya vs Zambia: Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-and-fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-3/libya/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-and-fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-3/libya/zambia/">Libya vs Zambia: Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
171 places, 9,729 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.