Jamaica vs Mauritius: Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant)

Jamaica
25.69 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritius
25.85 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Jamaica rank
24th
Mauritius rank
23rd

Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant) over time

  • Jamaica
  • Mauritius
510152025196119922023

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 25.85 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 25.69 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Jamaica, a difference of 0.16 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Jamaica ahead.

Jamaica ranks 24th and Mauritius ranks 23rd of 170 countries.

Jamaica has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jamaica Mauritius Difference Ahead
1960s 18.31 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 6 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 12.31 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Jamaica
1970s 15.89 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 5.89 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 10 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Jamaica
1980s 17.42 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 6.96 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 10.46 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Jamaica
1990s 22.43 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 13.86 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 8.57 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Jamaica
2000s 21.49 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 17.08 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 4.41 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Jamaica
2010s 22.24 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 17.58 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 4.66 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Jamaica
2020s 25.23 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 19.6 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 5.63 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Jamaica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher vegetables and fruit primary — gross production value (constant), Jamaica or Mauritius?
Mauritius, at 25.85 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 25.69 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Jamaica as of 2023.
What is the difference in vegetables and fruit primary — gross production value (constant) between Jamaica and Mauritius?
0.16 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Mauritius?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Jamaica and Mauritius rank globally for vegetables and fruit primary — gross production value (constant)?
Jamaica ranks 24th and Mauritius ranks 23rd of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Jamaica vs Mauritius: Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-and-fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-3/jamaica/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-and-fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-3/jamaica/mauritius/">Jamaica vs Mauritius: Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
171 places, 9,729 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.