Israel vs Malta: Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant)

Israel
62.62 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Malta
71.51 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Israel rank
6th
Malta rank
3rd

Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant) over time

  • Israel
  • Malta
050100150196119922023

How they compare

Malta currently reports 71.51 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 62.62 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Israel, a difference of 8.89 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Malta's figure about 1.1 times Israel's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.

Israel ranks 6th and Malta ranks 3rd of 170 countries.

Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Israel Malta Difference Ahead
1960s 28.95 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 91.26 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 62.32 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Malta
1970s 47.49 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 97.91 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 50.41 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Malta
1980s 54.56 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 111.02 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 56.46 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Malta
1990s 59.65 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 119.18 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 59.53 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Malta
2000s 63.01 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 118.1 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 55.1 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Malta
2010s 63.19 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 114.89 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 51.7 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Malta
2020s 61.85 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 72.28 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 10.43 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher vegetables and fruit primary — gross production value (constant), Israel or Malta?
Malta, at 71.51 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 62.62 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Israel as of 2023.
What is the difference in vegetables and fruit primary — gross production value (constant) between Israel and Malta?
8.89 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Malta?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Israel and Malta rank globally for vegetables and fruit primary — gross production value (constant)?
Israel ranks 6th and Malta ranks 3rd of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Israel vs Malta: Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-and-fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-3/israel/malta/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-and-fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-3/israel/malta/">Israel vs Malta: Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
171 places, 9,729 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.