Eswatini vs Malaysia: Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant)

Eswatini
4.51 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Malaysia
4.5 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini rank
98th
Malaysia rank
99th

Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant) over time

  • Eswatini
  • Malaysia
12345196119922023

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 4.51 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 4.5 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Malaysia, a difference of 0.01 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Malaysia ahead.

Eswatini ranks 98th and Malaysia ranks 99th of 170 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 6 and Malaysia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Malaysia Difference Ahead
1960s 1.16 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.04 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1234 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1970s 2.46 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.37 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.08 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1980s 3.21 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.55 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.66 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1990s 2.67 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.95 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.721 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2000s 2.75 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.1 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6418 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2010s 3.53 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5376 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2020s 3.98 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 4.1 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1151 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Malaysia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher vegetables and fruit primary — gross production value (constant), Eswatini or Malaysia?
Eswatini, at 4.51 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 4.5 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Malaysia as of 2023.
What is the difference in vegetables and fruit primary — gross production value (constant) between Eswatini and Malaysia?
0.01 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Malaysia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and Malaysia rank globally for vegetables and fruit primary — gross production value (constant)?
Eswatini ranks 98th and Malaysia ranks 99th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Malaysia: Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-and-fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-3/eswatini/malaysia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-and-fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-3/eswatini/malaysia/">Eswatini vs Malaysia: Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
171 places, 9,729 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.