Equatorial Guinea vs Kazakhstan: Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant)

Equatorial Guinea
0.9548 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Kazakhstan
1.04 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea rank
141st
Kazakhstan rank
140th

Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant) over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Kazakhstan
0.20.40.60.81196119922023

How they compare

Kazakhstan currently reports 1.04 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.9548 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.0852 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 1.1 times Equatorial Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 30 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 141st and Kazakhstan ranks 140th of 170 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 3 and Kazakhstan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Kazakhstan Difference Ahead
1990s 0.6129 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1853 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4276 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2000s 0.7497 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.44 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3097 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2010s 0.8942 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.7675 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1267 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2020s 0.9548 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.02 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0624 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Kazakhstan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher vegetables and fruit primary — gross production value (constant), Equatorial Guinea or Kazakhstan?
Kazakhstan, at 1.04 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.9548 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea as of 2023.
What is the difference in vegetables and fruit primary — gross production value (constant) between Equatorial Guinea and Kazakhstan?
0.0852 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Kazakhstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Kazakhstan?
30 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2023.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Kazakhstan rank globally for vegetables and fruit primary — gross production value (constant)?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 141st and Kazakhstan ranks 140th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Kazakhstan: Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-and-fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-3/equatorial-guinea/kazakhstan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-and-fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-3/equatorial-guinea/kazakhstan/">Equatorial Guinea vs Kazakhstan: Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
171 places, 9,729 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.