Egypt vs Tunisia: Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant)

Egypt
17.86 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Tunisia
17.59 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Egypt rank
36th
Tunisia rank
38th

Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant) over time

  • Egypt
  • Tunisia
05101520196119922023

How they compare

Egypt currently reports 17.86 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 17.59 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Tunisia, a difference of 0.27 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Tunisia ahead.

Egypt ranks 36th and Tunisia ranks 38th of 170 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Egypt averaged higher in 1 and Tunisia in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Egypt Tunisia Difference Ahead
1960s 2.56 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.25 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6954 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Tunisia
1970s 3.45 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 4.12 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6725 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Tunisia
1980s 5.21 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 5.53 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3147 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Tunisia
1990s 7.72 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 7.79 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0727 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Tunisia
2000s 12.23 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 10.69 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.54 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Egypt
2010s 14.81 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 15.38 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5678 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Tunisia
2020s 16.45 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 17.53 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.08 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Tunisia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher vegetables and fruit primary — gross production value (constant), Egypt or Tunisia?
Egypt, at 17.86 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 17.59 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Tunisia as of 2023.
What is the difference in vegetables and fruit primary — gross production value (constant) between Egypt and Tunisia?
0.27 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Egypt ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Tunisia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Egypt and Tunisia rank globally for vegetables and fruit primary — gross production value (constant)?
Egypt ranks 36th and Tunisia ranks 38th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Egypt vs Tunisia: Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-and-fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-3/egypt-arab-rep/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-and-fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-3/egypt-arab-rep/tunisia/">Egypt vs Tunisia: Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
171 places, 9,729 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.