Ecuador vs Nepal: Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant)

Ecuador
14.81 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Nepal
15.01 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
47th
Nepal rank
44th

Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant) over time

  • Ecuador
  • Nepal
051015196119922023

How they compare

Nepal currently reports 15.01 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 14.81 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Ecuador, a difference of 0.2 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 47th and Nepal ranks 44th of 170 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 5 and Nepal in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Nepal Difference Ahead
1960s 5.38 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5648 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 4.81 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ecuador
1970s 5.24 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.9769 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 4.26 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ecuador
1980s 5.29 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.38 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.92 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ecuador
1990s 8.78 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 5.38 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.4 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ecuador
2000s 12.01 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 7.67 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 4.34 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ecuador
2010s 13.13 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 13.24 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1009 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Nepal
2020s 13.41 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 14.82 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.41 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Nepal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher vegetables and fruit primary — gross production value (constant), Ecuador or Nepal?
Nepal, at 15.01 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 14.81 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in vegetables and fruit primary — gross production value (constant) between Ecuador and Nepal?
0.2 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Nepal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Nepal?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Nepal rank globally for vegetables and fruit primary — gross production value (constant)?
Ecuador ranks 47th and Nepal ranks 44th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Nepal: Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-and-fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-3/ecuador/nepal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-and-fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-3/ecuador/nepal/">Ecuador vs Nepal: Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
171 places, 9,729 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.