Chad vs Namibia: Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant)

Chad
0.0857 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia
0.087 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Chad rank
166th
Namibia rank
165th

Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant) over time

  • Chad
  • Namibia
00.020.040.060.08196119922023

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 0.087 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0857 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Chad, a difference of 0.0013 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 55 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Chad ahead.

Chad ranks 166th and Namibia ranks 165th of 170 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Chad averaged higher in 6 and Namibia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chad Namibia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0458 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0045 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0413 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chad
1970s 0.0559 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0057 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0502 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chad
1980s 0.0687 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0072 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0615 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chad
1990s 0.073 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0137 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0593 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chad
2000s 0.0763 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0402 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0361 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chad
2010s 0.0831 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0695 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0136 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chad
2020s 0.0855 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0857 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0002 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher vegetables and fruit primary — gross production value (constant), Chad or Namibia?
Namibia, at 0.087 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0857 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Chad as of 2023.
What is the difference in vegetables and fruit primary — gross production value (constant) between Chad and Namibia?
0.0013 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Namibia?
55 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chad and Namibia rank globally for vegetables and fruit primary — gross production value (constant)?
Chad ranks 166th and Namibia ranks 165th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chad vs Namibia: Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-and-fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-3/chad/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-and-fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-3/chad/namibia/">Chad vs Namibia: Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
171 places, 9,729 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.