Chad vs Mongolia: Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant)

Chad
0.0857 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mongolia
0.0402 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Chad rank
166th
Mongolia rank
168th

Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant) over time

  • Chad
  • Mongolia
00.020.040.060.08196119922023

How they compare

Chad currently reports 0.0857 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0402 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Mongolia, a difference of 0.0455 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Chad's figure about 2.1 times Mongolia's.

Across all 55 years both countries report, Chad has been ahead every year.

Chad ranks 166th and Mongolia ranks 168th of 170 countries.

Chad has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chad Mongolia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0458 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0028 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0431 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chad
1970s 0.0559 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0044 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0515 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chad
1980s 0.0687 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0084 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0604 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chad
1990s 0.073 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0076 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0654 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chad
2000s 0.0763 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0111 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0652 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chad
2010s 0.0831 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.016 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0671 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chad
2020s 0.0855 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0294 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0561 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chad

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher vegetables and fruit primary — gross production value (constant), Chad or Mongolia?
Chad, at 0.0857 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0402 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Mongolia as of 2023.
What is the difference in vegetables and fruit primary — gross production value (constant) between Chad and Mongolia?
0.0455 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Chad ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Mongolia?
55 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chad and Mongolia rank globally for vegetables and fruit primary — gross production value (constant)?
Chad ranks 166th and Mongolia ranks 168th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chad vs Mongolia: Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-and-fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-3/chad/mongolia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-and-fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-3/chad/mongolia/">Chad vs Mongolia: Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
171 places, 9,729 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.