Chad vs Iceland: Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant)

Chad
0.0857 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Iceland
0.0257 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Chad rank
166th
Iceland rank
169th

Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant) over time

  • Chad
  • Iceland
00.020.040.060.08196119922023

How they compare

Chad currently reports 0.0857 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0257 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Iceland, a difference of 0.06 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Chad's figure about 3.3 times Iceland's.

Across all 55 years both countries report, Chad has been ahead every year.

Chad ranks 166th and Iceland ranks 169th of 170 countries.

Chad has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chad Iceland Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0458 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0033 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0426 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chad
1970s 0.0559 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0041 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0518 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chad
1980s 0.0687 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0062 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0625 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chad
1990s 0.073 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0109 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0621 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chad
2000s 0.0763 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0206 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0557 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chad
2010s 0.0831 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0252 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0579 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chad
2020s 0.0855 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0255 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.06 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chad

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher vegetables and fruit primary — gross production value (constant), Chad or Iceland?
Chad, at 0.0857 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0257 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Iceland as of 2023.
What is the difference in vegetables and fruit primary — gross production value (constant) between Chad and Iceland?
0.06 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Chad ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Iceland?
55 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chad and Iceland rank globally for vegetables and fruit primary — gross production value (constant)?
Chad ranks 166th and Iceland ranks 169th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chad vs Iceland: Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-and-fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-3/chad/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-and-fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-3/chad/iceland/">Chad vs Iceland: Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
171 places, 9,729 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.