Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Ecuador: Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant)

Bosnia and Herzegovina
13.21 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador
14.81 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
50th
Ecuador rank
47th

Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant) over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Ecuador
57.51012.515196119922023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 14.81 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 13.21 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 1.6 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Bosnia and Herzegovina's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 28 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Ecuador ahead.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 50th and Ecuador ranks 47th of 170 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Ecuador Difference Ahead
1990s 5.96 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 10.5 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 4.54 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ecuador
2000s 7.78 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 12.01 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 4.23 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ecuador
2010s 9.92 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 13.13 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.21 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ecuador
2020s 12.34 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 13.41 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.07 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher vegetables and fruit primary — gross production value (constant), Bosnia and Herzegovina or Ecuador?
Ecuador, at 14.81 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 13.21 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2023.
What is the difference in vegetables and fruit primary — gross production value (constant) between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Ecuador?
1.6 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Ecuador?
28 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2023.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Ecuador rank globally for vegetables and fruit primary — gross production value (constant)?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 50th and Ecuador ranks 47th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Ecuador: Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-and-fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-3/bosnia-and-herzegovina/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-and-fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-3/bosnia-and-herzegovina/ecuador/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Ecuador: Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
171 places, 9,729 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.