Barbados vs Tunisia: Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant)

Barbados
17.53 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Tunisia
17.59 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Barbados rank
39th
Tunisia rank
38th

Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant) over time

  • Barbados
  • Tunisia
5101520196119922023

How they compare

Tunisia currently reports 17.59 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 17.53 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Barbados, a difference of 0.06 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Barbados ahead.

Barbados ranks 39th and Tunisia ranks 38th of 170 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 5 and Tunisia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Tunisia Difference Ahead
1960s 4.84 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.25 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.58 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Barbados
1970s 7.89 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 4.12 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.77 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Barbados
1980s 11.16 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 5.53 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 5.63 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Barbados
1990s 15.56 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 7.79 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 7.77 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Barbados
2000s 17.15 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 10.69 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 6.46 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Barbados
2010s 14.59 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 15.38 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.793 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Tunisia
2020s 16.49 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 17.53 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.04 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Tunisia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher vegetables and fruit primary — gross production value (constant), Barbados or Tunisia?
Tunisia, at 17.59 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 17.53 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Barbados as of 2023.
What is the difference in vegetables and fruit primary — gross production value (constant) between Barbados and Tunisia?
0.06 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Tunisia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Tunisia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Barbados and Tunisia rank globally for vegetables and fruit primary — gross production value (constant)?
Barbados ranks 39th and Tunisia ranks 38th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Tunisia: Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-and-fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-3/barbados/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-and-fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-3/barbados/tunisia/">Barbados vs Tunisia: Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
171 places, 9,729 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.