Bahamas vs Zimbabwe: Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant)

Bahamas
3.34 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
3.03 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Bahamas rank
108th
Zimbabwe rank
110th

Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant) over time

  • Bahamas
  • Zimbabwe
0123196119922023

How they compare

Bahamas currently reports 3.34 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 3.03 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.31 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Bahamas's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.

Across all 61 years both countries report, Bahamas has been ahead every year.

Bahamas ranks 108th and Zimbabwe ranks 110th of 170 countries.

Bahamas has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bahamas Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 1.04 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1328 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.9086 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Bahamas
1970s 1.36 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.187 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.17 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Bahamas
1980s 1.54 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2431 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.3 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Bahamas
1990s 1.64 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3175 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.33 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Bahamas
2000s 2.17 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5825 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.59 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Bahamas
2010s 3.18 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.54 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.64 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Bahamas
2020s 3.33 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.91 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4142 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Bahamas

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher vegetables and fruit primary — gross production value (constant), Bahamas or Zimbabwe?
Bahamas, at 3.34 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 3.03 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in vegetables and fruit primary — gross production value (constant) between Bahamas and Zimbabwe?
0.31 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Bahamas ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Zimbabwe?
61 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Bahamas and Zimbabwe rank globally for vegetables and fruit primary — gross production value (constant)?
Bahamas ranks 108th and Zimbabwe ranks 110th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bahamas vs Zimbabwe: Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-and-fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-3/bahamas-the/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-and-fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-3/bahamas-the/zimbabwe/">Bahamas vs Zimbabwe: Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
171 places, 9,729 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.