Central Asia and Southern Asia vs Comoros: Value of food imports in total merchandise exports (percent) (3-year)

Central Asia and Southern Asia
11 %
in 2022
Comoros
243 %
in 2022
Central Asia and Southern Asia rank
13th
Comoros rank
13th

Value of food imports in total merchandise exports (percent) (3-year) over time

  • Central Asia and Southern Asia
  • Comoros
0200400600200020112022

How they compare

Comoros currently reports 243 % against 11 % in Central Asia and Southern Asia, a difference of 232 %.

That makes Comoros's figure about 22.1 times Central Asia and Southern Asia's.

Across all 23 years both countries report, Comoros has been ahead every year.

Central Asia and Southern Asia ranks 13th and Comoros ranks 13th of 37 groups.

Comoros has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central Asia and Southern Asia Comoros Difference Ahead
2000s 7.3 % 202 % 194.7 % Comoros
2010s 9.7 % 316.1 % 306.4 % Comoros
2020s 11.33 % 258.33 % 247 % Comoros

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value of food imports in total merchandise exports (percent) (3-year), Central Asia and Southern Asia or Comoros?
Comoros, at 243 % against 11 % in Central Asia and Southern Asia as of 2022.
What is the difference in value of food imports in total merchandise exports (percent) (3-year) between Central Asia and Southern Asia and Comoros?
232 %, with Comoros ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central Asia and Southern Asia and Comoros?
23 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2022.
How do Central Asia and Southern Asia and Comoros rank globally for value of food imports in total merchandise exports (percent) (3-year)?
Central Asia and Southern Asia ranks 13th and Comoros ranks 13th of 37 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Value of food imports in total merchandise exports (percent) (3-year average) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central Asia and Southern Asia vs Comoros: Value of food imports in total merchandise exports (percent) (3-year). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/value-of-food-imports-in-total-merchandise-exports-percent-3-year-average-value/central-asia-and-southern-asia/comoros/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/value-of-food-imports-in-total-merchandise-exports-percent-3-year-average-value/central-asia-and-southern-asia/comoros/">Central Asia and Southern Asia vs Comoros: Value of food imports in total merchandise exports (percent) (3-year)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value of food imports in total merchandise exports (percent) (3-year average) — Value
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
237 places, 5,408 data points, 2000–2022
Last refreshed

The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.