Asia vs Comoros: Value of food imports in total merchandise exports (percent) (3-year)
Value of food imports in total merchandise exports (percent) (3-year) over time
- Asia
- Comoros
How they compare
Comoros currently reports 243 % against 6 % in Asia, a difference of 237 %.
That makes Comoros's figure about 40.5 times Asia's.
Across all 23 years both countries report, Comoros has been ahead every year.
Asia ranks 15th and Comoros ranks 13th of 19 groups.
Comoros has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Asia | Comoros | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4.4 % | 202 % | 197.6 % | Comoros |
| 2010s | 5.5 % | 316.1 % | 310.6 % | Comoros |
| 2020s | 6 % | 258.33 % | 252.33 % | Comoros |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher value of food imports in total merchandise exports (percent) (3-year), Asia or Comoros?
- Comoros, at 243 % against 6 % in Asia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in value of food imports in total merchandise exports (percent) (3-year) between Asia and Comoros?
- 237 %, with Comoros ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Asia and Comoros?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2022.
- How do Asia and Comoros rank globally for value of food imports in total merchandise exports (percent) (3-year)?
- Asia ranks 15th and Comoros ranks 13th of 19 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Value of food imports in total merchandise exports (percent) (3-year average) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.