Croatia vs Finland: Utilised agricultural area (UAA) managed by low-, medium- and
Croatia
394,695 Hectare
in 2021
Finland
579,178 Hectare
in 2021
Croatia rank
30th
Finland rank
29th
Utilised agricultural area (UAA) managed by low-, medium- and over time
- Croatia
- Finland
How they compare
Finland currently reports 579,178 Hectare against 394,695 Hectare in Croatia, a difference of 184,483 Hectare.
That makes Finland's figure about 1.5 times Croatia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Finland ahead.
Croatia ranks 30th and Finland ranks 29th of 38 countries.
Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Finland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 449,349 Hectare | 619,309 Hectare | 169,959 Hectare | Finland |
| 2020s | 475,496 Hectare | 593,039 Hectare | 117,543 Hectare | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher utilised agricultural area (uaa) managed by low-, medium- and, Croatia or Finland?
- Finland, at 579,178 Hectare against 394,695 Hectare in Croatia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in utilised agricultural area (uaa) managed by low-, medium- and between Croatia and Finland?
- 184,483 Hectare, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Finland?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2021.
- How do Croatia and Finland rank globally for utilised agricultural area (uaa) managed by low-, medium- and?
- Croatia ranks 30th and Finland ranks 29th of 38 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Eurostat, published as Utilised agricultural area (UAA) managed by low-, medium- and high-input farms. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.