Rwanda vs Uganda: Unmanufactured tobacco — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Rwanda
0.4257 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Uganda
0.3557 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda rank
15th
Uganda rank
18th

Unmanufactured tobacco — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Rwanda
  • Uganda
00.10.20.30.40.5196119922023

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 0.4257 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.3557 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Uganda, a difference of 0.07 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.2 times Uganda's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Uganda ahead.

Rwanda ranks 15th and Uganda ranks 18th of 115 countries.

Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Rwanda Uganda Difference Ahead
1960s 0.07 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0463 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0237 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Rwanda
1970s 0.1216 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0362 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0854 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Rwanda
1980s 0.2506 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0164 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2342 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Rwanda
1990s 0.3306 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0902 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2404 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Rwanda
2000s 0.3721 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3026 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0695 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Rwanda
2010s 0.4501 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3442 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.106 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Rwanda
2020s 0.4257 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3539 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0718 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher unmanufactured tobacco — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Rwanda or Uganda?
Rwanda, at 0.4257 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.3557 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Uganda as of 2023.
What is the difference in unmanufactured tobacco — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Rwanda and Uganda?
0.07 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Uganda?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Rwanda and Uganda rank globally for unmanufactured tobacco — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Rwanda ranks 15th and Uganda ranks 18th of 115 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Unmanufactured tobacco — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Rwanda vs Uganda: Unmanufactured tobacco — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/unmanufactured-tobacco-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/rwanda/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/unmanufactured-tobacco-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/rwanda/uganda/">Rwanda vs Uganda: Unmanufactured tobacco — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Unmanufactured tobacco — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
116 places, 6,336 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Unmanufactured tobacco — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.