Pakistan vs Rwanda: Unmanufactured tobacco — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Pakistan
0.4412 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
0.4257 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Pakistan rank
13th
Rwanda rank
15th

Unmanufactured tobacco — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Pakistan
  • Rwanda
0.10.20.30.40.5196119922023

How they compare

Pakistan currently reports 0.4412 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.4257 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Rwanda, a difference of 0.0155 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Pakistan ahead.

Pakistan ranks 13th and Rwanda ranks 15th of 115 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Pakistan averaged higher in 3 and Rwanda in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Pakistan Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 0.2789 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.07 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2089 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Pakistan
1970s 0.2306 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1216 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.109 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Pakistan
1980s 0.214 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2506 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0366 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Rwanda
1990s 0.2621 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3306 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0685 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Rwanda
2000s 0.2888 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3721 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0834 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Rwanda
2010s 0.321 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4501 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1291 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Rwanda
2020s 0.426 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4257 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0003 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Pakistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher unmanufactured tobacco — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Pakistan or Rwanda?
Pakistan, at 0.4412 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.4257 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Rwanda as of 2023.
What is the difference in unmanufactured tobacco — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Pakistan and Rwanda?
0.0155 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Pakistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and Rwanda?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Pakistan and Rwanda rank globally for unmanufactured tobacco — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Pakistan ranks 13th and Rwanda ranks 15th of 115 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Unmanufactured tobacco — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Pakistan vs Rwanda: Unmanufactured tobacco — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/unmanufactured-tobacco-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/pakistan/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/unmanufactured-tobacco-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/pakistan/rwanda/">Pakistan vs Rwanda: Unmanufactured tobacco — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Unmanufactured tobacco — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
116 places, 6,336 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Unmanufactured tobacco — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.