Malawi vs World: Unmanufactured tobacco — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Malawi
2.85 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
World
0.1034 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Malawi rank
1st
World rank
1st

Unmanufactured tobacco — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Malawi
  • World
012345196119922023

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 2.85 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.1034 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in World, a difference of 2.75 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Malawi's figure about 27.6 times World's.

Across all 58 years both countries report, Malawi has been ahead every year.

Malawi ranks 1st and World ranks 1st of 115 countries.

Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malawi World Difference Ahead
1960s 0.3874 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0948 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2925 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Malawi
1970s 0.8713 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.113 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.7583 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Malawi
1980s 1.62 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1373 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.48 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Malawi
1990s 2.9 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1364 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.76 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Malawi
2000s 2.79 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1134 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.67 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Malawi
2010s 2.89 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1182 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.77 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Malawi
2020s 2.44 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1006 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.34 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Malawi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher unmanufactured tobacco — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Malawi or World?
Malawi, at 2.85 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.1034 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in World as of 2023.
What is the difference in unmanufactured tobacco — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Malawi and World?
2.75 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and World?
58 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Malawi and World rank globally for unmanufactured tobacco — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Malawi ranks 1st and World ranks 1st of 115 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Unmanufactured tobacco — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malawi vs World: Unmanufactured tobacco — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/unmanufactured-tobacco-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/malawi/world/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/unmanufactured-tobacco-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/malawi/world/">Malawi vs World: Unmanufactured tobacco — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Unmanufactured tobacco — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
116 places, 6,336 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Unmanufactured tobacco — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.