Jordan vs Oman: Unmanufactured tobacco — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Jordan
0.0081 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Oman
0.0081 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Jordan rank
82nd
Oman rank
83rd

Unmanufactured tobacco — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Jordan
  • Oman
00.050.10.15196119922023

How they compare

Jordan currently reports 0.0081 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0081 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Oman, a difference of 0 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1966 it was Jordan ahead.

Jordan ranks 82nd and Oman ranks 83rd of 115 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Jordan averaged higher in 5 and Oman in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jordan Oman Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0445 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0018 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0427 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Jordan
1970s 0.0319 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0027 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0292 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Jordan
1980s 0.0841 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0098 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0743 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Jordan
1990s 0.0602 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0102 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.05 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Jordan
2000s 0.0245 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.009 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0155 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Jordan
2010s 0.0018 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0085 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0066 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Oman
2020s 0.0078 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0082 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0004 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Oman

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher unmanufactured tobacco — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Jordan or Oman?
Jordan, at 0.0081 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0081 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Oman as of 2023.
What is the difference in unmanufactured tobacco — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Jordan and Oman?
0 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Jordan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Oman?
54 years are reported by both, from 1966 to 2023.
How do Jordan and Oman rank globally for unmanufactured tobacco — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Jordan ranks 82nd and Oman ranks 83rd of 115 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Unmanufactured tobacco — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Jordan vs Oman: Unmanufactured tobacco — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/unmanufactured-tobacco-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/jordan/oman/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/unmanufactured-tobacco-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/jordan/oman/">Jordan vs Oman: Unmanufactured tobacco — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Unmanufactured tobacco — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
116 places, 6,336 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Unmanufactured tobacco — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.