Guinea vs Nepal: Unmanufactured tobacco — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Guinea
0.0218 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Nepal
0.0219 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Guinea rank
64th
Nepal rank
63rd

Unmanufactured tobacco — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Guinea
  • Nepal
00.050.10.15196119922023

How they compare

Nepal currently reports 0.0219 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0218 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Guinea, a difference of 0.0001 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Nepal ahead.

Guinea ranks 64th and Nepal ranks 63rd of 115 countries.

Nepal has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea Nepal Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0113 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0886 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Nepal
1970s 0.0123 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0902 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0779 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Nepal
1980s 0.0155 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0864 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0709 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Nepal
1990s 0.0199 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0885 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0686 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Nepal
2000s 0.02 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0497 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0297 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Nepal
2010s 0.0217 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0286 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0069 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Nepal
2020s 0.0217 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0219 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0002 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Nepal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher unmanufactured tobacco — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Guinea or Nepal?
Nepal, at 0.0219 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0218 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Guinea as of 2023.
What is the difference in unmanufactured tobacco — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Guinea and Nepal?
0.0001 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Nepal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Nepal?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Guinea and Nepal rank globally for unmanufactured tobacco — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Guinea ranks 64th and Nepal ranks 63rd of 115 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Unmanufactured tobacco — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea vs Nepal: Unmanufactured tobacco — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/unmanufactured-tobacco-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/guinea/nepal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/unmanufactured-tobacco-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/guinea/nepal/">Guinea vs Nepal: Unmanufactured tobacco — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Unmanufactured tobacco — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
116 places, 6,336 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Unmanufactured tobacco — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.