Eswatini vs Mexico: Unmanufactured tobacco — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Eswatini
0.021 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mexico
0.021 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini rank
65th
Mexico rank
66th

Unmanufactured tobacco — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Eswatini
  • Mexico
00.0250.050.0750.1196119922023

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 0.021 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.021 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Mexico, a difference of 0 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mexico ahead.

Eswatini ranks 65th and Mexico ranks 66th of 115 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 2 and Mexico in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Mexico Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0264 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.07 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0436 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Mexico
1970s 0.0483 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0776 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0293 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Mexico
1980s 0.0163 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0683 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0521 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Mexico
1990s 0.0038 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0472 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0434 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Mexico
2000s 0.0117 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0253 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0136 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Mexico
2010s 0.0192 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0162 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.003 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2020s 0.021 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0189 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0021 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher unmanufactured tobacco — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Eswatini or Mexico?
Eswatini, at 0.021 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.021 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Mexico as of 2023.
What is the difference in unmanufactured tobacco — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Eswatini and Mexico?
0 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Mexico?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and Mexico rank globally for unmanufactured tobacco — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Eswatini ranks 65th and Mexico ranks 66th of 115 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Unmanufactured tobacco — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Mexico: Unmanufactured tobacco — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/unmanufactured-tobacco-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/eswatini/mexico/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/unmanufactured-tobacco-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/eswatini/mexico/">Eswatini vs Mexico: Unmanufactured tobacco — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Unmanufactured tobacco — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
116 places, 6,336 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Unmanufactured tobacco — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.