Cuba vs Samoa: Unmanufactured tobacco — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Cuba
0.2643 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Samoa
0.204 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Cuba rank
24th
Samoa rank
26th

Unmanufactured tobacco — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Cuba
  • Samoa
00.250.50.7511.2196119922023

How they compare

Cuba currently reports 0.2643 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.204 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Samoa, a difference of 0.0603 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Cuba's figure about 1.3 times Samoa's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Cuba has been ahead every year.

Cuba ranks 24th and Samoa ranks 26th of 115 countries.

Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Samoa Difference Ahead
1960s 0.9451 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0208 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.9243 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Cuba
1970s 0.8232 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0999 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.7233 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Cuba
1980s 0.8188 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1187 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.7001 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Cuba
1990s 0.5932 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1093 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4838 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Cuba
2000s 0.596 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1219 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4741 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Cuba
2010s 0.508 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1819 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3261 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Cuba
2020s 0.4261 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2039 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2222 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher unmanufactured tobacco — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Cuba or Samoa?
Cuba, at 0.2643 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.204 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Samoa as of 2023.
What is the difference in unmanufactured tobacco — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Cuba and Samoa?
0.0603 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Cuba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Samoa?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cuba and Samoa rank globally for unmanufactured tobacco — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Cuba ranks 24th and Samoa ranks 26th of 115 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Unmanufactured tobacco — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Samoa: Unmanufactured tobacco — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/unmanufactured-tobacco-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/cuba/samoa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/unmanufactured-tobacco-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/cuba/samoa/">Cuba vs Samoa: Unmanufactured tobacco — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Unmanufactured tobacco — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
116 places, 6,336 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Unmanufactured tobacco — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.