China vs India: Unmanufactured tobacco — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

China
0.5482 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
India
0.5479 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
China rank
10th
India rank
11th

Unmanufactured tobacco — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • China
  • India
00.20.40.60.81196119922023

How they compare

China currently reports 0.5482 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.5479 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in India, a difference of 0.0003 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was India ahead.

China ranks 10th and India ranks 11th of 115 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, China averaged higher in 4 and India in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade China India Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1551 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2569 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1018 1000 Int$ per square kilometre India
1970s 0.2301 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3037 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0735 1000 Int$ per square kilometre India
1980s 0.4679 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3588 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1092 1000 Int$ per square kilometre China
1990s 0.7067 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4485 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2582 1000 Int$ per square kilometre China
2000s 0.6152 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3905 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2247 1000 Int$ per square kilometre China
2010s 0.6786 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5684 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1102 1000 Int$ per square kilometre China
2020s 0.522 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5511 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0291 1000 Int$ per square kilometre India

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher unmanufactured tobacco — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), China or India?
China, at 0.5482 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.5479 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in India as of 2023.
What is the difference in unmanufactured tobacco — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between China and India?
0.0003 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and India?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do China and India rank globally for unmanufactured tobacco — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
China ranks 10th and India ranks 11th of 115 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Unmanufactured tobacco — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs India: Unmanufactured tobacco — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/unmanufactured-tobacco-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/china/india/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/unmanufactured-tobacco-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/china/india/">China vs India: Unmanufactured tobacco — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Unmanufactured tobacco — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
116 places, 6,336 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Unmanufactured tobacco — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.