Chile vs Peru: Unmanufactured tobacco — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Chile
0.0052 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Peru
0.0036 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
91st
Peru rank
94th

Unmanufactured tobacco — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Chile
  • Peru
00.020.040.06196119922023

How they compare

Chile currently reports 0.0052 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0036 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Peru, a difference of 0.0016 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Chile's figure about 1.4 times Peru's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Chile has been ahead every year.

Chile ranks 91st and Peru ranks 94th of 115 countries.

Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Peru Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0205 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0065 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.014 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile
1970s 0.0214 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0062 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0152 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile
1980s 0.0255 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0053 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0202 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile
1990s 0.0421 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0133 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0288 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile
2000s 0.0242 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0078 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0163 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile
2010s 0.021 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0032 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0178 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile
2020s 0.0111 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0035 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0076 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher unmanufactured tobacco — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Chile or Peru?
Chile, at 0.0052 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0036 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Peru as of 2023.
What is the difference in unmanufactured tobacco — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Chile and Peru?
0.0016 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Peru?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chile and Peru rank globally for unmanufactured tobacco — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Chile ranks 91st and Peru ranks 94th of 115 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Unmanufactured tobacco — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Peru: Unmanufactured tobacco — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/unmanufactured-tobacco-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/chile/peru/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/unmanufactured-tobacco-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/chile/peru/">Chile vs Peru: Unmanufactured tobacco — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Unmanufactured tobacco — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
116 places, 6,336 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Unmanufactured tobacco — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.