Central African Republic vs New Zealand: Unmanufactured tobacco — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Central African Republic
0.0017 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
New Zealand
0.0017 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 1995
Central African Republic rank
100th
New Zealand rank
101st

Unmanufactured tobacco — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Central African Republic
  • New Zealand
00.010.020.030.04196119922023

How they compare

Central African Republic currently reports 0.0017 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0017 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in New Zealand, a difference of 0 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 35 shared years of data; in 1961 it was New Zealand ahead.

Central African Republic ranks 100th and New Zealand ranks 101st of 115 countries.

New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic New Zealand Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0023 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0302 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0279 1000 Int$ per square kilometre New Zealand
1970s 0.0061 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0282 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.022 1000 Int$ per square kilometre New Zealand
1980s 0.0031 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0154 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0123 1000 Int$ per square kilometre New Zealand
1990s 0.0022 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0058 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0037 1000 Int$ per square kilometre New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher unmanufactured tobacco — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Central African Republic or New Zealand?
Central African Republic, at 0.0017 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0017 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in New Zealand as of 2023.
What is the difference in unmanufactured tobacco — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Central African Republic and New Zealand?
0 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Central African Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and New Zealand?
35 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1995.
How do Central African Republic and New Zealand rank globally for unmanufactured tobacco — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Central African Republic ranks 100th and New Zealand ranks 101st of 115 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Unmanufactured tobacco — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs New Zealand: Unmanufactured tobacco — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/unmanufactured-tobacco-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/central-african-republic/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/unmanufactured-tobacco-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/central-african-republic/new-zealand/">Central African Republic vs New Zealand: Unmanufactured tobacco — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Unmanufactured tobacco — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
116 places, 6,336 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Unmanufactured tobacco — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.