Brazil vs Ecuador: Unmanufactured tobacco — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Brazil
0.1826 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador
0.1881 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Brazil rank
32nd
Ecuador rank
29th

Unmanufactured tobacco — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Brazil
  • Ecuador
00.050.10.150.20.25196119922023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 0.1881 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.1826 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Brazil, a difference of 0.0055 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Brazil ahead.

Brazil ranks 32nd and Ecuador ranks 29th of 115 countries.

Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Ecuador Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0595 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0115 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0481 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Brazil
1970s 0.0817 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0167 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.065 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Brazil
1980s 0.1088 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0265 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0823 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Brazil
1990s 0.1413 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0266 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1148 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Brazil
2000s 0.2092 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0658 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1434 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Brazil
2010s 0.2197 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.061 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1587 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Brazil
2020s 0.1873 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1054 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0819 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Brazil

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher unmanufactured tobacco — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Brazil or Ecuador?
Ecuador, at 0.1881 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.1826 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Brazil as of 2023.
What is the difference in unmanufactured tobacco — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Brazil and Ecuador?
0.0055 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Ecuador?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Brazil and Ecuador rank globally for unmanufactured tobacco — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Brazil ranks 32nd and Ecuador ranks 29th of 115 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Unmanufactured tobacco — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Ecuador: Unmanufactured tobacco — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/unmanufactured-tobacco-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/brazil/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/unmanufactured-tobacco-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/brazil/ecuador/">Brazil vs Ecuador: Unmanufactured tobacco — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Unmanufactured tobacco — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
116 places, 6,336 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Unmanufactured tobacco — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.