Austria vs Congo: Unmanufactured tobacco — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Austria
0.0029 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2017
Congo
0.0032 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Austria rank
98th
Congo rank
96th

Unmanufactured tobacco — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Austria
  • Congo
00.0050.010.0150.02196119922023

How they compare

Congo currently reports 0.0032 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0029 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Austria, a difference of 0.0003 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times Austria's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 55 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Austria ahead.

Austria ranks 98th and Congo ranks 96th of 115 countries.

Austria has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Austria Congo Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0167 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0038 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0128 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Austria
1970s 0.0137 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0057 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.008 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Austria
1980s 0.012 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0016 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0105 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Austria
1990s 0.008 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0009 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0071 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Austria
2000s 0.0077 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0019 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0059 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Austria
2010s 0.0037 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0031 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0006 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Austria

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher unmanufactured tobacco — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Austria or Congo?
Congo, at 0.0032 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0029 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Austria as of 2023.
What is the difference in unmanufactured tobacco — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Austria and Congo?
0.0003 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Congo?
55 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
How do Austria and Congo rank globally for unmanufactured tobacco — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Austria ranks 98th and Congo ranks 96th of 115 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Unmanufactured tobacco — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Austria vs Congo: Unmanufactured tobacco — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/unmanufactured-tobacco-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/austria/congo-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/unmanufactured-tobacco-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/austria/congo-rep/">Austria vs Congo: Unmanufactured tobacco — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Unmanufactured tobacco — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
116 places, 6,336 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Unmanufactured tobacco — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.