Angola vs Portugal: Unmanufactured tobacco — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Angola
0.005 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Portugal
0.006 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2017
Angola rank
92nd
Portugal rank
89th

Unmanufactured tobacco — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Angola
  • Portugal
00.20.40.6196119922023

How they compare

Portugal currently reports 0.006 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.005 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Angola, a difference of 0.001 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Portugal's figure about 1.2 times Angola's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 48 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Portugal ahead.

Angola ranks 92nd and Portugal ranks 89th of 115 countries.

Portugal has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola Portugal Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0076 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3703 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3627 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Portugal
1970s 0.0075 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2348 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2273 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Portugal
1980s 0.0061 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1014 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0953 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Portugal
1990s 0.0072 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1202 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.113 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Portugal
2000s 0.0058 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0989 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0931 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Portugal
2010s 0.0054 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.007 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0016 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Portugal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher unmanufactured tobacco — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Angola or Portugal?
Portugal, at 0.006 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.005 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Angola as of 2017.
What is the difference in unmanufactured tobacco — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Angola and Portugal?
0.001 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Portugal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Portugal?
48 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
How do Angola and Portugal rank globally for unmanufactured tobacco — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Angola ranks 92nd and Portugal ranks 89th of 115 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Unmanufactured tobacco — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Angola vs Portugal: Unmanufactured tobacco — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/unmanufactured-tobacco-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/angola/portugal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/unmanufactured-tobacco-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/angola/portugal/">Angola vs Portugal: Unmanufactured tobacco — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Unmanufactured tobacco — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
116 places, 6,336 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Unmanufactured tobacco — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.