Angola vs Peru: Unmanufactured tobacco — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Angola
0.005 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Peru
0.0036 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Angola rank
92nd
Peru rank
94th

Unmanufactured tobacco — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Angola
  • Peru
00.010.020.03196119922023

How they compare

Angola currently reports 0.005 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0036 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Peru, a difference of 0.0014 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Angola's figure about 1.4 times Peru's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Peru ahead.

Angola ranks 92nd and Peru ranks 94th of 115 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 5 and Peru in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola Peru Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0076 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0065 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0011 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Angola
1970s 0.0075 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0062 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0013 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Angola
1980s 0.0061 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0053 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0008 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Angola
1990s 0.0067 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0133 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0067 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Peru
2000s 0.0058 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0078 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.002 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Peru
2010s 0.0053 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0032 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0021 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Angola
2020s 0.005 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0035 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0015 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Angola

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher unmanufactured tobacco — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Angola or Peru?
Angola, at 0.005 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0036 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Peru as of 2023.
What is the difference in unmanufactured tobacco — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Angola and Peru?
0.0014 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Angola ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Peru?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Angola and Peru rank globally for unmanufactured tobacco — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Angola ranks 92nd and Peru ranks 94th of 115 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Unmanufactured tobacco — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Angola vs Peru: Unmanufactured tobacco — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/unmanufactured-tobacco-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/angola/peru/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/unmanufactured-tobacco-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/angola/peru/">Angola vs Peru: Unmanufactured tobacco — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Unmanufactured tobacco — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
116 places, 6,336 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Unmanufactured tobacco — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.