Burundi vs Yemen: Unmanufactured tobacco — Area harvested, per unit of GDP
Burundi
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Yemen
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2018
Burundi rank
6th
Yemen rank
7th
Unmanufactured tobacco — Area harvested, per unit of GDP over time
- Burundi
- Yemen
How they compare
Burundi currently reports 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Yemen, a difference of 0 ha per US$ of GDP.
That makes Burundi's figure about 1.1 times Yemen's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Burundi ahead.
Burundi ranks 6th and Yemen ranks 7th of 125 countries.
Burundi has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burundi | Yemen | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Burundi |
| 2000s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Burundi |
| 2010s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Burundi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher unmanufactured tobacco — area harvested, per unit of gdp, Burundi or Yemen?
- Burundi, at 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Yemen as of 2024.
- What is the difference in unmanufactured tobacco — area harvested, per unit of gdp between Burundi and Yemen?
- 0 ha per US$ of GDP, with Burundi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Yemen?
- 29 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2018.
- How do Burundi and Yemen rank globally for unmanufactured tobacco — area harvested, per unit of gdp?
- Burundi ranks 6th and Yemen ranks 7th of 125 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Unmanufactured tobacco — Area harvested, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Unmanufactured tobacco — Area harvested divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.