Comoros vs Malta: Treenuts — Tourist consumption
Treenuts — Tourist consumption over time
- Comoros
- Malta
How they compare
Comoros currently reports 0 1000 t against 0 1000 t in Malta, a difference of 0 1000 t.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.
Comoros ranks 7th and Malta ranks 7th of 45 countries.
Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Comoros | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 1000 t | 0.1111 1000 t | 0.1111 1000 t | Malta |
| 2020s | 0 1000 t | 0 1000 t | 0 1000 t | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher treenuts — tourist consumption, Comoros or Malta?
- Comoros, at 0 1000 t against 0 1000 t in Malta as of 2020.
- What is the difference in treenuts — tourist consumption between Comoros and Malta?
- 0 1000 t, with Comoros ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Malta?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2020.
- How do Comoros and Malta rank globally for treenuts — tourist consumption?
- Comoros ranks 7th and Malta ranks 7th of 45 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Treenuts — Tourist consumption. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.