China vs Eswatini: Treenuts, Total — Area harvested, per capita
China
0.0005 ha per person
in 2024
Eswatini
0.0005 ha per person
in 2024
China rank
55th
Eswatini rank
53rd
Treenuts, Total — Area harvested, per capita over time
- China
- Eswatini
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 0.0005 ha per person against 0.0005 ha per person in China, a difference of 0 ha per person.
That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.1 times China's.
Across all 28 years both countries report, Eswatini has been ahead every year.
China ranks 55th and Eswatini ranks 53rd of 111 countries.
Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0002 ha per person | 0.0008 ha per person | 0.0006 ha per person | Eswatini |
| 2000s | 0.0003 ha per person | 0.0008 ha per person | 0.0005 ha per person | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 0.0005 ha per person | 0.0006 ha per person | 0.0002 ha per person | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 0.0005 ha per person | 0.0005 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher treenuts, total — area harvested, per capita, China or Eswatini?
- Eswatini, at 0.0005 ha per person against 0.0005 ha per person in China as of 2024.
- What is the difference in treenuts, total — area harvested, per capita between China and Eswatini?
- 0 ha per person, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Eswatini?
- 28 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2024.
- How do China and Eswatini rank globally for treenuts, total — area harvested, per capita?
- China ranks 55th and Eswatini ranks 53rd of 111 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Treenuts, Total — Area harvested, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Treenuts, Total — Area harvested divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.