Serbia vs Togo: Tree Cover Loss
Tree Cover Loss over time
- Serbia
- Togo
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 5,788 hectares against 5,677 hectares in Togo, a difference of 111 hectares.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Togo ahead.
Serbia ranks 97th and Togo ranks 98th of 190 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Serbia averaged higher in 1 and Togo in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Serbia | Togo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2,053 hectares | 2,583 hectares | 529.56 hectares | Togo |
| 2010s | 3,433 hectares | 3,236 hectares | 196.6 hectares | Serbia |
| 2020s | 5,243 hectares | 5,358 hectares | 114.5 hectares | Togo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss, Serbia or Togo?
- Serbia, at 5,788 hectares against 5,677 hectares in Togo as of 2025.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss between Serbia and Togo?
- 111 hectares, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Togo?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2025.
- How do Serbia and Togo rank globally for tree cover loss?
- Serbia ranks 97th and Togo ranks 98th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Forest Watch. Tree Cover Loss (Hansen/UMD/Google/USGS/NASA), published as Tree Cover Loss (hectares). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Shows year-by-year tree cover loss, defined as stand level replacement of vegetation greater than 5 meters, within the selected area. The tree cover loss data set is a collaboration of the University of Maryland, Google, USGS, and NASA, and uses Landsat satellite images to map annual tree cover loss at a 30 × 30 meter resolution. Note that “tree cover loss” is not the same as “deforestation” – tree cover loss includes change in both natural and planted forest, and does not need to be human caused. The data from 2011 onward were produced with an updated methodology that may capture additional loss. Comparisons between the original 2001-2010 data and future years should be performed with caution.