Romania vs United Kingdom: Tree Cover Loss
Tree Cover Loss over time
- Romania
- United Kingdom
How they compare
United Kingdom currently reports 26,566 hectares against 23,475 hectares in Romania, a difference of 3,091 hectares.
That makes United Kingdom's figure about 1.1 times Romania's.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2001 it was United Kingdom ahead.
Romania ranks 68th and United Kingdom ranks 66th of 190 countries.
United Kingdom has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Romania | United Kingdom | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 18,495 hectares | 20,158 hectares | 1,663 hectares | United Kingdom |
| 2010s | 18,216 hectares | 27,625 hectares | 9,408 hectares | United Kingdom |
| 2020s | 21,278 hectares | 25,706 hectares | 4,428 hectares | United Kingdom |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss, Romania or United Kingdom?
- United Kingdom, at 26,566 hectares against 23,475 hectares in Romania as of 2025.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss between Romania and United Kingdom?
- 3,091 hectares, with United Kingdom ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Romania and United Kingdom?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2025.
- How do Romania and United Kingdom rank globally for tree cover loss?
- Romania ranks 68th and United Kingdom ranks 66th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Forest Watch. Tree Cover Loss (Hansen/UMD/Google/USGS/NASA), published as Tree Cover Loss (hectares). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Shows year-by-year tree cover loss, defined as stand level replacement of vegetation greater than 5 meters, within the selected area. The tree cover loss data set is a collaboration of the University of Maryland, Google, USGS, and NASA, and uses Landsat satellite images to map annual tree cover loss at a 30 × 30 meter resolution. Note that “tree cover loss” is not the same as “deforestation” – tree cover loss includes change in both natural and planted forest, and does not need to be human caused. The data from 2011 onward were produced with an updated methodology that may capture additional loss. Comparisons between the original 2001-2010 data and future years should be performed with caution.