Romania vs South Africa: Tree Cover Loss
Tree Cover Loss over time
- Romania
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 27,424 hectares against 23,475 hectares in Romania, a difference of 3,949 hectares.
That makes South Africa's figure about 1.2 times Romania's.
Across all 25 years both countries report, South Africa has been ahead every year.
Romania ranks 68th and South Africa ranks 65th of 190 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Romania | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 18,495 hectares | 77,317 hectares | 58,822 hectares | South Africa |
| 2010s | 18,216 hectares | 71,988 hectares | 53,771 hectares | South Africa |
| 2020s | 21,278 hectares | 41,974 hectares | 20,696 hectares | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss, Romania or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 27,424 hectares against 23,475 hectares in Romania as of 2025.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss between Romania and South Africa?
- 3,949 hectares, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Romania and South Africa?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2025.
- How do Romania and South Africa rank globally for tree cover loss?
- Romania ranks 68th and South Africa ranks 65th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Forest Watch. Tree Cover Loss (Hansen/UMD/Google/USGS/NASA), published as Tree Cover Loss (hectares). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Shows year-by-year tree cover loss, defined as stand level replacement of vegetation greater than 5 meters, within the selected area. The tree cover loss data set is a collaboration of the University of Maryland, Google, USGS, and NASA, and uses Landsat satellite images to map annual tree cover loss at a 30 × 30 meter resolution. Note that “tree cover loss” is not the same as “deforestation” – tree cover loss includes change in both natural and planted forest, and does not need to be human caused. The data from 2011 onward were produced with an updated methodology that may capture additional loss. Comparisons between the original 2001-2010 data and future years should be performed with caution.