Niger vs Seychelles: Tree Cover Loss

Niger
0 hectares
in 2025
Seychelles
0 hectares
in 2025
Niger rank
167th
Seychelles rank
167th

Tree Cover Loss over time

  • Niger
  • Seychelles
00.511.52200120132025

How they compare

Niger currently reports 0 hectares against 0 hectares in Seychelles, a difference of 0 hectares.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Seychelles ahead.

Niger ranks 167th and Seychelles ranks 167th of 189 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Niger averaged higher in 1 and Seychelles in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Niger Seychelles Difference Ahead
2000s 0.1111 hectares 0 hectares 0.1111 hectares Niger
2010s 0 hectares 0.5 hectares 0.5 hectares Seychelles
2020s 0 hectares 0.1667 hectares 0.1667 hectares Seychelles

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tree cover loss, Niger or Seychelles?
Niger, at 0 hectares against 0 hectares in Seychelles as of 2025.
What is the difference in tree cover loss between Niger and Seychelles?
0 hectares, with Niger ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Niger and Seychelles?
25 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2025.
How do Niger and Seychelles rank globally for tree cover loss?
Niger ranks 167th and Seychelles ranks 167th of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Global Forest Watch. Tree Cover Loss (Hansen/UMD/Google/USGS/NASA), published as Tree Cover Loss (hectares). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Tree Cover Loss (hectares)
Unit
hectares
Source
Global Forest Watch. Tree Cover Loss (Hansen/UMD/Google/USGS/NASA)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 4,725 data points, 2001–2025
Last refreshed

Shows year-by-year tree cover loss, defined as stand level replacement of vegetation greater than 5 meters, within the selected area. The tree cover loss data set is a collaboration of the University of Maryland, Google, USGS, and NASA, and uses Landsat satellite images to map annual tree cover loss at a 30 × 30 meter resolution. Note that “tree cover loss” is not the same as “deforestation” – tree cover loss includes change in both natural and planted forest, and does not need to be human caused. The data from 2011 onward were produced with an updated methodology that may capture additional loss. Comparisons between the original 2001-2010 data and future years should be performed with caution.