Mozambique vs Myanmar: Tree Cover Loss
Tree Cover Loss over time
- Mozambique
- Myanmar
How they compare
Mozambique currently reports 248,493 hectares against 226,990 hectares in Myanmar, a difference of 21,503 hectares.
That makes Mozambique's figure about 1.1 times Myanmar's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Mozambique ahead.
Mozambique ranks 16th and Myanmar ranks 19th of 190 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Mozambique averaged higher in 1 and Myanmar in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mozambique | Myanmar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 137,621 hectares | 110,196 hectares | 27,425 hectares | Mozambique |
| 2010s | 204,701 hectares | 269,628 hectares | 64,927 hectares | Myanmar |
| 2020s | 259,636 hectares | 281,041 hectares | 21,405 hectares | Myanmar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss, Mozambique or Myanmar?
- Mozambique, at 248,493 hectares against 226,990 hectares in Myanmar as of 2025.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss between Mozambique and Myanmar?
- 21,503 hectares, with Mozambique ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and Myanmar?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2025.
- How do Mozambique and Myanmar rank globally for tree cover loss?
- Mozambique ranks 16th and Myanmar ranks 19th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Forest Watch. Tree Cover Loss (Hansen/UMD/Google/USGS/NASA), published as Tree Cover Loss (hectares). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Shows year-by-year tree cover loss, defined as stand level replacement of vegetation greater than 5 meters, within the selected area. The tree cover loss data set is a collaboration of the University of Maryland, Google, USGS, and NASA, and uses Landsat satellite images to map annual tree cover loss at a 30 × 30 meter resolution. Note that “tree cover loss” is not the same as “deforestation” – tree cover loss includes change in both natural and planted forest, and does not need to be human caused. The data from 2011 onward were produced with an updated methodology that may capture additional loss. Comparisons between the original 2001-2010 data and future years should be performed with caution.