Montenegro vs Timor-Leste: Tree Cover Loss
Tree Cover Loss over time
- Montenegro
- Timor-Leste
How they compare
Timor-Leste currently reports 991 hectares against 836 hectares in Montenegro, a difference of 155 hectares.
That makes Timor-Leste's figure about 1.2 times Montenegro's.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Montenegro ahead.
Montenegro ranks 124th and Timor-Leste ranks 122nd of 190 countries.
Timor-Leste has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Montenegro | Timor-Leste | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 616.89 hectares | 1,589 hectares | 971.89 hectares | Timor-Leste |
| 2010s | 1,067 hectares | 1,296 hectares | 229.1 hectares | Timor-Leste |
| 2020s | 969.33 hectares | 1,236 hectares | 267 hectares | Timor-Leste |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss, Montenegro or Timor-Leste?
- Timor-Leste, at 991 hectares against 836 hectares in Montenegro as of 2025.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss between Montenegro and Timor-Leste?
- 155 hectares, with Timor-Leste ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Montenegro and Timor-Leste?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2025.
- How do Montenegro and Timor-Leste rank globally for tree cover loss?
- Montenegro ranks 124th and Timor-Leste ranks 122nd of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Forest Watch. Tree Cover Loss (Hansen/UMD/Google/USGS/NASA), published as Tree Cover Loss (hectares). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Shows year-by-year tree cover loss, defined as stand level replacement of vegetation greater than 5 meters, within the selected area. The tree cover loss data set is a collaboration of the University of Maryland, Google, USGS, and NASA, and uses Landsat satellite images to map annual tree cover loss at a 30 × 30 meter resolution. Note that “tree cover loss” is not the same as “deforestation” – tree cover loss includes change in both natural and planted forest, and does not need to be human caused. The data from 2011 onward were produced with an updated methodology that may capture additional loss. Comparisons between the original 2001-2010 data and future years should be performed with caution.