Moldova vs Morocco: Tree Cover Loss
Tree Cover Loss over time
- Moldova
- Morocco
How they compare
Morocco currently reports 2,666 hectares against 2,413 hectares in Moldova, a difference of 253 hectares.
That makes Morocco's figure about 1.1 times Moldova's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Morocco ahead.
Moldova ranks 113th and Morocco ranks 111th of 190 countries.
Morocco has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Moldova | Morocco | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 176 hectares | 2,238 hectares | 2,062 hectares | Morocco |
| 2010s | 676.5 hectares | 1,728 hectares | 1,051 hectares | Morocco |
| 2020s | 1,549 hectares | 4,209 hectares | 2,660 hectares | Morocco |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss, Moldova or Morocco?
- Morocco, at 2,666 hectares against 2,413 hectares in Moldova as of 2025.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss between Moldova and Morocco?
- 253 hectares, with Morocco ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Moldova and Morocco?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2025.
- How do Moldova and Morocco rank globally for tree cover loss?
- Moldova ranks 113th and Morocco ranks 111th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Forest Watch. Tree Cover Loss (Hansen/UMD/Google/USGS/NASA), published as Tree Cover Loss (hectares). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Shows year-by-year tree cover loss, defined as stand level replacement of vegetation greater than 5 meters, within the selected area. The tree cover loss data set is a collaboration of the University of Maryland, Google, USGS, and NASA, and uses Landsat satellite images to map annual tree cover loss at a 30 × 30 meter resolution. Note that “tree cover loss” is not the same as “deforestation” – tree cover loss includes change in both natural and planted forest, and does not need to be human caused. The data from 2011 onward were produced with an updated methodology that may capture additional loss. Comparisons between the original 2001-2010 data and future years should be performed with caution.