Madagascar, Republic of vs Sweden: Tree Cover Loss
Tree Cover Loss over time
- Madagascar, Republic of
- Sweden
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 291,434 hectares against 262,864 hectares in Madagascar, Republic of, a difference of 28,570 hectares.
That makes Sweden's figure about 1.1 times Madagascar, Republic of's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Sweden ahead.
Madagascar, Republic of ranks 14th and Sweden ranks 11th of 190 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Madagascar, Republic of averaged higher in 1 and Sweden in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Madagascar, Republic of | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 106,183 hectares | 207,767 hectares | 101,583 hectares | Sweden |
| 2010s | 293,071 hectares | 262,467 hectares | 30,604 hectares | Madagascar, Republic of |
| 2020s | 254,941 hectares | 320,624 hectares | 65,684 hectares | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss, Madagascar, Republic of or Sweden?
- Sweden, at 291,434 hectares against 262,864 hectares in Madagascar, Republic of as of 2025.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss between Madagascar, Republic of and Sweden?
- 28,570 hectares, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Madagascar, Republic of and Sweden?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2025.
- How do Madagascar, Republic of and Sweden rank globally for tree cover loss?
- Madagascar, Republic of ranks 14th and Sweden ranks 11th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Forest Watch. Tree Cover Loss (Hansen/UMD/Google/USGS/NASA), published as Tree Cover Loss (hectares). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Shows year-by-year tree cover loss, defined as stand level replacement of vegetation greater than 5 meters, within the selected area. The tree cover loss data set is a collaboration of the University of Maryland, Google, USGS, and NASA, and uses Landsat satellite images to map annual tree cover loss at a 30 × 30 meter resolution. Note that “tree cover loss” is not the same as “deforestation” – tree cover loss includes change in both natural and planted forest, and does not need to be human caused. The data from 2011 onward were produced with an updated methodology that may capture additional loss. Comparisons between the original 2001-2010 data and future years should be performed with caution.